Saturday, June 30, 2012

Eric Holder could be jailed over ‘Fast and Furious’ docs

The House Oversight Committee has scheduled a vote for next week on whether or not to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress over his refusal to turn over documents detailing the Justice Department’s notorious Fast and Furious (aka Operation Gunrunner) program, which put thousands of assault weapons in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels.

The Committee subpoenaed the documents on Oct. 12, 2011, which was followed by several unheeded warnings from Committee Chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA).

On Jan. 31, a frustrated Issa said that Holder has tried to “obstruct our investigation and deceive the public.”

Issa also made public, a letter written to Holder stating: “This committee will have no alternative but to move forward with proceedings to hold you in contempt of Congress…Your actions lead us to conclude that the department is actively engaged in a cover-up.”

Issa gave the Attorney General until Feb. 9 to comply…which he obviously did not do to the Committee’s satisfaction.

So what are the consequences for Eric Holder if he is found to be in contempt of Congress?

Under current law, if a subpoenaed witness refuses to either produce certain documents or to testify, the Committee may cite the individual for contempt and refer the matter to the full chamber (in this case, the U.S. House of Representatives) for action.

If the House then voted on and passed a resolution to issue a contempt citation, the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House would be tasked with arresting Holder.

The Attorney General would then be brought to the House floor to answer to the charges and could then either be released or imprisoned.

The House has the power to either imprison the defendant as a punishment, or until the witness fully complies with the subpoena.

Either way, the witness may only be held in prison until the current session of Congress ends (January 2013 in this case).

So, it is possible that Eric Holder could go to jail over failing to cooperate with Congress’ investigation.

The last time a U.S. Attorney General was held in contempt of Congress occurred on August 6, 1998, after Janet Reno refused to turn over certain Clinton administration documents to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

However, the full House did not consider the measure for a vote and the documents were eventually revealed during President Clinton’s impeachment trial.

What did Holder know and when did he actually know it?

Could Holder also be charged as an accomplice to murder?

Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccsee justice served immigration news

Gay rights activist arrested for possession of child pornography

  • Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes

    Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes are ending their 5 year marriage.

    What went wrong?

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccparticipate in immigration news polls

    Friday, June 29, 2012

    10-year-old boy strip searched in NC elementary school

  • Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes

    Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes are ending their 5 year marriage.

    What went wrong?

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccsee justice served immigration news

    Gay rights activist arrested for possession of child pornography

  • Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes

    Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes are ending their 5 year marriage.

    What went wrong?

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccparticipate in immigration news polls

    Eric Holder could be jailed over ‘Fast and Furious’ docs

    The House Oversight Committee has scheduled a vote for next week on whether or not to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress over his refusal to turn over documents detailing the Justice Department’s notorious Fast and Furious (aka Operation Gunrunner) program, which put thousands of assault weapons in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels.

    The Committee subpoenaed the documents on Oct. 12, 2011, which was followed by several unheeded warnings from Committee Chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA).

    On Jan. 31, a frustrated Issa said that Holder has tried to “obstruct our investigation and deceive the public.”

    Issa also made public, a letter written to Holder stating: “This committee will have no alternative but to move forward with proceedings to hold you in contempt of Congress…Your actions lead us to conclude that the department is actively engaged in a cover-up.”

    Issa gave the Attorney General until Feb. 9 to comply…which he obviously did not do to the Committee’s satisfaction.

    So what are the consequences for Eric Holder if he is found to be in contempt of Congress?

    Under current law, if a subpoenaed witness refuses to either produce certain documents or to testify, the Committee may cite the individual for contempt and refer the matter to the full chamber (in this case, the U.S. House of Representatives) for action.

    If the House then voted on and passed a resolution to issue a contempt citation, the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House would be tasked with arresting Holder.

    The Attorney General would then be brought to the House floor to answer to the charges and could then either be released or imprisoned.

    The House has the power to either imprison the defendant as a punishment, or until the witness fully complies with the subpoena.

    Either way, the witness may only be held in prison until the current session of Congress ends (January 2013 in this case).

    So, it is possible that Eric Holder could go to jail over failing to cooperate with Congress’ investigation.

    The last time a U.S. Attorney General was held in contempt of Congress occurred on August 6, 1998, after Janet Reno refused to turn over certain Clinton administration documents to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

    However, the full House did not consider the measure for a vote and the documents were eventually revealed during President Clinton’s impeachment trial.

    What did Holder know and when did he actually know it?

    Could Holder also be charged as an accomplice to murder?

    Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccget more immigration news

    Monday, June 25, 2012

    10-year-old boy strip searched in NC elementary school

  • Stripper stars

    Slideshow: These stars weren't too shy to strip on film.

    See who's played a stripper

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccparticipate in immigration news polls

    Eric Holder could be jailed over ‘Fast and Furious’ docs

    The House Oversight Committee has scheduled a vote for next week on whether or not to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress over his refusal to turn over documents detailing the Justice Department’s notorious Fast and Furious (aka Operation Gunrunner) program, which put thousands of assault weapons in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels.

    The Committee subpoenaed the documents on Oct. 12, 2011, which was followed by several unheeded warnings from Committee Chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA).

    On Jan. 31, a frustrated Issa said that Holder has tried to “obstruct our investigation and deceive the public.”

    Issa also made public, a letter written to Holder stating: “This committee will have no alternative but to move forward with proceedings to hold you in contempt of Congress…Your actions lead us to conclude that the department is actively engaged in a cover-up.”

    Issa gave the Attorney General until Feb. 9 to comply…which he obviously did not do to the Committee’s satisfaction.

    So what are the consequences for Eric Holder if he is found to be in contempt of Congress?

    Under current law, if a subpoenaed witness refuses to either produce certain documents or to testify, the Committee may cite the individual for contempt and refer the matter to the full chamber (in this case, the U.S. House of Representatives) for action.

    If the House then voted on and passed a resolution to issue a contempt citation, the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House would be tasked with arresting Holder.

    The Attorney General would then be brought to the House floor to answer to the charges and could then either be released or imprisoned.

    The House has the power to either imprison the defendant as a punishment, or until the witness fully complies with the subpoena.

    Either way, the witness may only be held in prison until the current session of Congress ends (January 2013 in this case).

    So, it is possible that Eric Holder could go to jail over failing to cooperate with Congress’ investigation.

    The last time a U.S. Attorney General was held in contempt of Congress occurred on August 6, 1998, after Janet Reno refused to turn over certain Clinton administration documents to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

    However, the full House did not consider the measure for a vote and the documents were eventually revealed during President Clinton’s impeachment trial.

    What did Holder know and when did he actually know it?

    Could Holder also be charged as an accomplice to murder?

    Powered By iWebRSS.co.cc immigration news - sex crimes of illegal immigrants

    Saturday, June 23, 2012

    10-year-old boy strip searched in NC elementary school

  • Movie Vampires

    Slideshow: See scary, silly, and seductive vampires from the movies.

    Who has your fav fangs?

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccparticipate in immigration news polls

    Eric Holder could be jailed over ‘Fast and Furious’ docs

    The House Oversight Committee has scheduled a vote for next week on whether or not to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress over his refusal to turn over documents detailing the Justice Department’s notorious Fast and Furious (aka Operation Gunrunner) program, which put thousands of assault weapons in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels.

    The Committee subpoenaed the documents on Oct. 12, 2011, which was followed by several unheeded warnings from Committee Chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA).

    On Jan. 31, a frustrated Issa said that Holder has tried to “obstruct our investigation and deceive the public.”

    Issa also made public, a letter written to Holder stating: “This committee will have no alternative but to move forward with proceedings to hold you in contempt of Congress…Your actions lead us to conclude that the department is actively engaged in a cover-up.”

    Issa gave the Attorney General until Feb. 9 to comply…which he obviously did not do to the Committee’s satisfaction.

    So what are the consequences for Eric Holder if he is found to be in contempt of Congress?

    Under current law, if a subpoenaed witness refuses to either produce certain documents or to testify, the Committee may cite the individual for contempt and refer the matter to the full chamber (in this case, the U.S. House of Representatives) for action.

    If the House then voted on and passed a resolution to issue a contempt citation, the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House would be tasked with arresting Holder.

    The Attorney General would then be brought to the House floor to answer to the charges and could then either be released or imprisoned.

    The House has the power to either imprison the defendant as a punishment, or until the witness fully complies with the subpoena.

    Either way, the witness may only be held in prison until the current session of Congress ends (January 2013 in this case).

    So, it is possible that Eric Holder could go to jail over failing to cooperate with Congress’ investigation.

    The last time a U.S. Attorney General was held in contempt of Congress occurred on August 6, 1998, after Janet Reno refused to turn over certain Clinton administration documents to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

    However, the full House did not consider the measure for a vote and the documents were eventually revealed during President Clinton’s impeachment trial.

    What did Holder know and when did he actually know it?

    Could Holder also be charged as an accomplice to murder?

    Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccsee justice served immigration news

    Friday, June 22, 2012

    Eric Holder could be jailed over ‘Fast and Furious’ docs

    The House Oversight Committee has scheduled a vote for next week on whether or not to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress over his refusal to turn over documents detailing the Justice Department’s notorious Fast and Furious (aka Operation Gunrunner) program, which put thousands of assault weapons in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels.

    The Committee subpoenaed the documents on Oct. 12, 2011, which was followed by several unheeded warnings from Committee Chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA).

    On Jan. 31, a frustrated Issa said that Holder has tried to “obstruct our investigation and deceive the public.”

    Issa also made public, a letter written to Holder stating: “This committee will have no alternative but to move forward with proceedings to hold you in contempt of Congress…Your actions lead us to conclude that the department is actively engaged in a cover-up.”

    Issa gave the Attorney General until Feb. 9 to comply…which he obviously did not do to the Committee’s satisfaction.

    So what are the consequences for Eric Holder if he is found to be in contempt of Congress?

    Under current law, if a subpoenaed witness refuses to either produce certain documents or to testify, the Committee may cite the individual for contempt and refer the matter to the full chamber (in this case, the U.S. House of Representatives) for action.

    If the House then voted on and passed a resolution to issue a contempt citation, the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House would be tasked with arresting Holder.

    The Attorney General would then be brought to the House floor to answer to the charges and could then either be released or imprisoned.

    The House has the power to either imprison the defendant as a punishment, or until the witness fully complies with the subpoena.

    Either way, the witness may only be held in prison until the current session of Congress ends (January 2013 in this case).

    So, it is possible that Eric Holder could go to jail over failing to cooperate with Congress’ investigation.

    The last time a U.S. Attorney General was held in contempt of Congress occurred on August 6, 1998, after Janet Reno refused to turn over certain Clinton administration documents to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

    However, the full House did not consider the measure for a vote and the documents were eventually revealed during President Clinton’s impeachment trial.

    What did Holder know and when did he actually know it?

    Could Holder also be charged as an accomplice to murder?

    Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccsee justice served immigration news

    10-year-old boy strip searched in NC elementary school

  • Movie Vampires

    Slideshow: See scary, silly, and seductive vampires from the movies.

    Who has your fav fangs?

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccget more immigration news

    Wednesday, June 20, 2012

    Eric Holder could be jailed over ‘Fast and Furious’ docs

    The House Oversight Committee has scheduled a vote for next week on whether or not to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress over his refusal to turn over documents detailing the Justice Department’s notorious Fast and Furious (aka Operation Gunrunner) program, which put thousands of assault weapons in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels.

    The Committee subpoenaed the documents on Oct. 12, 2011, which was followed by several unheeded warnings from Committee Chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA).

    On Jan. 31, a frustrated Issa said that Holder has tried to “obstruct our investigation and deceive the public.”

    Issa also made public, a letter written to Holder stating: “This committee will have no alternative but to move forward with proceedings to hold you in contempt of Congress…Your actions lead us to conclude that the department is actively engaged in a cover-up.”

    Issa gave the Attorney General until Feb. 9 to comply…which he obviously did not do to the Committee’s satisfaction.

    So what are the consequences for Eric Holder if he is found to be in contempt of Congress?

    Under current law, if a subpoenaed witness refuses to either produce certain documents or to testify, the Committee may cite the individual for contempt and refer the matter to the full chamber (in this case, the U.S. House of Representatives) for action.

    If the House then voted on and passed a resolution to issue a contempt citation, the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House would be tasked with arresting Holder.

    The Attorney General would then be brought to the House floor to answer to the charges and could then either be released or imprisoned.

    The House has the power to either imprison the defendant as a punishment, or until the witness fully complies with the subpoena.

    Either way, the witness may only be held in prison until the current session of Congress ends (January 2013 in this case).

    So, it is possible that Eric Holder could go to jail over failing to cooperate with Congress’ investigation.

    The last time a U.S. Attorney General was held in contempt of Congress occurred on August 6, 1998, after Janet Reno refused to turn over certain Clinton administration documents to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

    However, the full House did not consider the measure for a vote and the documents were eventually revealed during President Clinton’s impeachment trial.

    What did Holder know and when did he actually know it?

    Could Holder also be charged as an accomplice to murder?

    Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccsee justice served immigration news

    10-year-old boy strip searched in NC elementary school

  • NBA finals

    The Heat have a 3-1 series lead, but will they make it all the way?

    Exclusive game coverage

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.cc immigration news - sex crimes of illegal immigrants

    Tuesday, June 19, 2012

    10-year-old boy strip searched in NC elementary school

  • NBA finals

    The Heat have a 2-1 series lead, but will they make it all the way?

    Exclusive game coverage

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.cc immigration news - sex crimes of illegal immigrants

    Eric Holder could be jailed over ‘Fast and Furious’ docs

    The House Oversight Committee has scheduled a vote for next week on whether or not to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress over his refusal to turn over documents detailing the Justice Department’s notorious Fast and Furious (aka Operation Gunrunner) program, which put thousands of assault weapons in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels.

    The Committee subpoenaed the documents on Oct. 12, 2011, which was followed by several unheeded warnings from Committee Chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA).

    On Jan. 31, a frustrated Issa said that Holder has tried to “obstruct our investigation and deceive the public.”

    Issa also made public, a letter written to Holder stating: “This committee will have no alternative but to move forward with proceedings to hold you in contempt of Congress…Your actions lead us to conclude that the department is actively engaged in a cover-up.”

    Issa gave the Attorney General until Feb. 9 to comply…which he obviously did not do to the Committee’s satisfaction.

    So what are the consequences for Eric Holder if he is found to be in contempt of Congress?

    Under current law, if a subpoenaed witness refuses to either produce certain documents or to testify, the Committee may cite the individual for contempt and refer the matter to the full chamber (in this case, the U.S. House of Representatives) for action.

    If the House then voted on and passed a resolution to issue a contempt citation, the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House would be tasked with arresting Holder.

    The Attorney General would then be brought to the House floor to answer to the charges and could then either be released or imprisoned.

    The House has the power to either imprison the defendant as a punishment, or until the witness fully complies with the subpoena.

    Either way, the witness may only be held in prison until the current session of Congress ends (January 2013 in this case).

    So, it is possible that Eric Holder could go to jail over failing to cooperate with Congress’ investigation.

    The last time a U.S. Attorney General was held in contempt of Congress occurred on August 6, 1998, after Janet Reno refused to turn over certain Clinton administration documents to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

    However, the full House did not consider the measure for a vote and the documents were eventually revealed during President Clinton’s impeachment trial.

    What did Holder know and when did he actually know it?

    Could Holder also be charged as an accomplice to murder?

    Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccwatch immigration news videos

    Sunday, June 17, 2012

    Eric Holder could be jailed over ‘Fast and Furious’ docs

    The House Oversight Committee has scheduled a vote for next week on whether or not to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress over his refusal to turn over documents detailing the Justice Department’s notorious Fast and Furious (aka Operation Gunrunner) program, which put thousands of assault weapons in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels.

    The Committee subpoenaed the documents on Oct. 12, 2011, which was followed by several unheeded warnings from Committee Chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA).

    On Jan. 31, a frustrated Issa said that Holder has tried to “obstruct our investigation and deceive the public.”

    Issa also made public, a letter written to Holder stating: “This committee will have no alternative but to move forward with proceedings to hold you in contempt of Congress…Your actions lead us to conclude that the department is actively engaged in a cover-up.”

    Issa gave the Attorney General until Feb. 9 to comply…which he obviously did not do to the Committee’s satisfaction.

    So what are the consequences for Eric Holder if he is found to be in contempt of Congress?

    Under current law, if a subpoenaed witness refuses to either produce certain documents or to testify, the Committee may cite the individual for contempt and refer the matter to the full chamber (in this case, the U.S. House of Representatives) for action.

    If the House then voted on and passed a resolution to issue a contempt citation, the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House would be tasked with arresting Holder.

    The Attorney General would then be brought to the House floor to answer to the charges and could then either be released or imprisoned.

    The House has the power to either imprison the defendant as a punishment, or until the witness fully complies with the subpoena.

    Either way, the witness may only be held in prison until the current session of Congress ends (January 2013 in this case).

    So, it is possible that Eric Holder could go to jail over failing to cooperate with Congress’ investigation.

    The last time a U.S. Attorney General was held in contempt of Congress occurred on August 6, 1998, after Janet Reno refused to turn over certain Clinton administration documents to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

    However, the full House did not consider the measure for a vote and the documents were eventually revealed during President Clinton’s impeachment trial.

    What did Holder know and when did he actually know it?

    Could Holder also be charged as an accomplice to murder?

    Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccsee justice served immigration news

    Friday, June 15, 2012

    Eric Holder could be jailed over ‘Fast and Furious’ docs

    The House Oversight Committee has scheduled a vote for next week on whether or not to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress over his refusal to turn over documents detailing the Justice Department’s notorious Fast and Furious (aka Operation Gunrunner) program, which put thousands of assault weapons in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels.

    The Committee subpoenaed the documents on Oct. 12, 2011, which was followed by several unheeded warnings from Committee Chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA).

    On Jan. 31, a frustrated Issa said that Holder has tried to “obstruct our investigation and deceive the public.”

    Issa also made public, a letter written to Holder stating: “This committee will have no alternative but to move forward with proceedings to hold you in contempt of Congress…Your actions lead us to conclude that the department is actively engaged in a cover-up.”

    Issa gave the Attorney General until Feb. 9 to comply…which he obviously did not do to the Committee’s satisfaction.

    So what are the consequences for Eric Holder if he is found to be in contempt of Congress?

    Under current law, if a subpoenaed witness refuses to either produce certain documents or to testify, the Committee may cite the individual for contempt and refer the matter to the full chamber (in this case, the U.S. House of Representatives) for action.

    If the House then voted on and passed a resolution to issue a contempt citation, the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House would be tasked with arresting Holder.

    The Attorney General would then be brought to the House floor to answer to the charges and could then either be released or imprisoned.

    The House has the power to either imprison the defendant as a punishment, or until the witness fully complies with the subpoena.

    Either way, the witness may only be held in prison until the current session of Congress ends (January 2013 in this case).

    So, it is possible that Eric Holder could go to jail over failing to cooperate with Congress’ investigation.

    The last time a U.S. Attorney General was held in contempt of Congress occurred on August 6, 1998, after Janet Reno refused to turn over certain Clinton administration documents to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

    However, the full House did not consider the measure for a vote and the documents were eventually revealed during President Clinton’s impeachment trial.

    What did Holder know and when did he actually know it?

    Could Holder also be charged as an accomplice to murder?

    Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccwatch immigration news videos

    Wednesday, June 13, 2012

    Eric Holder could be jailed over ‘Fast and Furious’ docs

    The House Oversight Committee has scheduled a vote for next week on whether or not to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress over his refusal to turn over documents detailing the Justice Department’s notorious Fast and Furious (aka Operation Gunrunner) program, which put thousands of assault weapons in the hands of the Mexican drug cartels.

    The Committee subpoenaed the documents on Oct. 12, 2011, which was followed by several unheeded warnings from Committee Chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA).

    On Jan. 31, a frustrated Issa said that Holder has tried to “obstruct our investigation and deceive the public.”

    Issa also made public, a letter written to Holder stating: “This committee will have no alternative but to move forward with proceedings to hold you in contempt of Congress…Your actions lead us to conclude that the department is actively engaged in a cover-up.”

    Issa gave the Attorney General until Feb. 9 to comply…which he obviously did not do to the Committee’s satisfaction.

    So what are the consequences for Eric Holder if he is found to be in contempt of Congress?

    Under current law, if a subpoenaed witness refuses to either produce certain documents or to testify, the Committee may cite the individual for contempt and refer the matter to the full chamber (in this case, the U.S. House of Representatives) for action.

    If the House then voted on and passed a resolution to issue a contempt citation, the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House would be tasked with arresting Holder.

    The Attorney General would then be brought to the House floor to answer to the charges and could then either be released or imprisoned.

    The House has the power to either imprison the defendant as a punishment, or until the witness fully complies with the subpoena.

    Either way, the witness may only be held in prison until the current session of Congress ends (January 2013 in this case).

    So, it is possible that Eric Holder could go to jail over failing to cooperate with Congress’ investigation.

    The last time a U.S. Attorney General was held in contempt of Congress occurred on August 6, 1998, after Janet Reno refused to turn over certain Clinton administration documents to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

    However, the full House did not consider the measure for a vote and the documents were eventually revealed during President Clinton’s impeachment trial.

    What did Holder know and when did he actually know it?

    Could Holder also be charged as an accomplice to murder?

    Powered By iWebRSS.co.cc immigration news - sex crimes of illegal immigrants

    Wednesday, June 6, 2012

    The war crime you have never heard of....attack on the USS Liberty

    Next week marks the 45th anniversary of a ruthless, unprovoked and as yet, unpunished attack on an American warship in international waters which resulted in a tremendous loss of life and left more permanently injured. The attack was perpetrated by a country which our government labels a staunch ally, though the men who survived the attack know a different story.

    The attack

    On June 8, 1967, the surveillance ship USS Liberty was on duty in international waters off the Sinai Peninsula, when it was attacked by Israeli forces. Though the ship was clearly marked, Israel claimed the act of war to simply be a case of “mistaken identity.”

    Despite the loss of 34 American sailors, there has never been a meaningful investigation into the attack.

    That morning, many Liberty sailors were enjoying some down time sunbathing on deck, and had been watching as Israeli planes made over-flights of the ship. The crew counted a total of 13 such flights which were so low that they could see the faces of the Israeli pilots and even exchanged waves.

    At 2 p.m. Israeli jets began hitting the Liberty with rocket and cannon fire, the decks were then napalmed, and the ship was hit with a torpedo from an Israeli attack boat. By the time the attack had ended, the Liberty had sustained over 800 rocket and cannon strikes, 34 sailors were dead and 172 injured, even the Liberty's life boats had been shredded by Israeli machine gun fire (a war crime).

    Such a dastardly and deliberate attack would ordinarily bring down the full wrath of the U.S. military upon the perpetrators. However, not only were there no retaliatory strikes ordered but the Johnson administration would not even allow nearby U.S. Navy forces to come to Liberty's aid and put a stop to the attack.

    Once the Liberty could establish radio contact, they hailed the Sixth Fleet for assistance.

    Twice, F-4 Phantoms were launched from the USS Saratoga and the USS America and both times Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara ordered the planes to return. After the second recall, Rear Adm. William Geis personally called the Pentagon. During that phone call, President Johnson himself reportedly came on the line and ordered the planes to return.

    Years ago, USS Liberty survivor, Cdr. David Lewis stated that Adm. Geis told him in confidence that President Johnson said: “I do not care if every man drowned and the ship sank, we will not embarrass an ally.”

    The 'investigation'

    Following the attack, a U.S. Navy Board of Inquiry convened. Though the amount of evidence was immense and there were several dozen interviews to conduct, the Court of Inquiry was given only one week to complete their work. The Court was not even allowed to consider sworn declarations from more than 60 still-hospitalized Liberty sailors.

    Chief Legal Counsel to the Board of Inquiry Capt. Ward Boston and president of the Court Adm. Isaac C. Kidd felt it necessary to travel to Israel and interview those who had taken part in the attack. They were rebuffed in that effort by Adm. John S. McCain Jr., then serving as Commander-in-Chief, Naval Forces Europe.

    Adm. McCain would not allow the two any contact with the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF).In a sworn affidavit, Capt. Ward Boston (ret.) made the following statements concurring with the cover-up of the USS Liberty attack:

    “I know from personal conversations I had with Admiral Kidd that President Lyndon Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara ordered him to conclude that the attack was a case of ‘mistaken identity’ despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

    Admiral Kidd told me, after returning from Washington D.C. that he had been ordered to sit down with two civilians from either the White House or the Defense Department, and rewrite portions of the court's findings.

    Admiral Kidd also told me that he had been ordered to ‘put the lid’ on everything having to do with the attack on USS Liberty. We were never to speak of it and we were to caution everyone else involved that they could never speak of it again.

    I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of that statement as I know that the Court of Inquiry transcript that has been released to the public is not the same one that I certified and sent off to Washington.

    Finally, the testimony of Lt. Painter concerning the deliberate machine gunning of the life rafts by the Israeli torpedo boat crews, which I distinctly recall being given at the Court of Inquiry and included in the original transcript is now missing and has been excised.”

    On Jan. 8, 2004, Capt. Boston concluded: “The evidence was clear. Both Adm. Kidd and I believed with certainty that this attack...was a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew. It was our shared belief that the attack could not possibly have been an accident. I am certain that the Israeli pilots [and] their superiors were well aware that the ship was American.”

    In 2003, an independent committee comprised of retired high-ranking military officers and a former U.S. Ambassador to the Middle-East formed to examine the attack on the Liberty and the subsequent cover-up. On Oct. 22, 2003, the group came to Capitol Hill to release their findings and ask Congress for an official investigation.

    Committee member and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Thomas Moorer made the following statement: “Congress has never investigated the recall by the White House of U.S. Navy aircraft sent to rescue the Liberty while the ship was still under attack. The White House cancellation of the Navy's attempt to rescue the Liberty is the most disgraceful thing I have witnessed in my entire military career.”

    He continued: “Why would our government put Israel's interests ahead of our own? Does it continue to do so? This is an important issue that should be investigated by an independent Commission of Inquiry, the findings have grave implications for our national security and for the American people. In order to confront this problem, the American people and our elected officials will need to overcome their fear of the pro-Israel lobby in the United States.”

    In 1991, Adm. Moorer told the Washington Post: “To suggest that they [the IDF] couldn't identify the ship is...ridiculous. Anybody who could not identify the Liberty could not tell the difference between the White House and the Washington Monument.”

    Why did it happen?

    Israel claimed that they mistook the Liberty for the Egyptian horse carrier El Quseir.However, the El Quseir was only 275 feet long as compared to the 455 foot length of the Liberty.

    It was later learned that the El Quseir was actually in port in Alexandria for the duration of the Six Days War.

    The USS Liberty was well marked and flew a large American flag atop her mast. In fact, the official Navy Board of Inquiry report contains the following statement: “The Navy inquiry confirms testimony of five members of the crew that they had personally observed the [American flag] was hoisted. Hull markings were clear and freshly painted.”

    Despite the official Israeli story of mistaken identity, two Israeli pilots radioed base and clearly identified the ship as American. They were ordered to attack the ship anyway, both refused. The pair was immediately arrested upon returning to base.

    In 1982, an Israeli pilot who took part in the attack, Evan Toni, spoke extensively with Rep. Paul McCloskey (R-CA). He told McCloskey that his superiors told him to ignore the markings and U.S. flag. Toni claimed that he and another pilot radioed base and clearly identified the ship as American.

    Former U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon, Dwight Porter, confirmed the pilot's account. Porter told columnist Robert Novak that he heard the exchange as radio transmissions were being monitored from the embassy.

    There are two prevailing theories as to why Israeli forces attacked the Liberty. One is that they would sink the ship and blame it on Egypt, thus prompting the U.S. to enter the war on the side of Israel. That theory was supported by Capt. Ward Boston, who died in 2008. The other is that Israel did not want the U.S. to know about the unprovoked attacks their troops were carrying out. Shortly after the liberty was nearly destroyed, Israeli troops began attacking Syria.

    Israel's 'payment'

    In 1980, Sen. Adlai Stevenson III (D-IL) held a press conference at which time he announced his belief that the Israeli attack on the Liberty had not been a tragic accident but a deliberate act. In his last year in the U.S. Senate, Stevenson promised a formal investigation.

    Many pro-Israel groups began pouring money into the campaign of Stevenson’s opponent and he was subsequently defeated.

    However, shortly after Stevenson's announcement, the Israeli government contacted the Carter White House. They offered to settle the damage claims for a rather insulting $6 million. Though President Carter was out of town, Vice-President Walter Mondale readily accepted the deal.

    It was obvious to most that the only reason Israel agreed to pay anything was due to Sen. Stevenson’s interest in the case.

    Israel did pay the $6 million in three annual payments of $2 million. However, the payments were rather meaningless, as Congress simply increased the amount of aid given to Israel by $2 million each of those three years. The American taxpayers were actually billed for the damages inflicted upon their own sailors.

    The victims

    For his actions during the attack, USS Liberty Capt. William McGonagle was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor at a private Washington Navy Yard ceremony. However, on the very same day that Capt. McGonagle received the medal, President Johnson held a very public White House ceremony honoring other CMH awardees. McGonagle's citation does not mention that his ship came under attack from Israeli forces.

    Perhaps, more maddening than crucial facts deleted from a medal citation is that which is omitted from the tombstones of the 34 fallen USS Liberty crewmen. Their headstones simply read “Died in Eastern Mediterranean.”

    The names of the USS Liberty crewmen who were killed while under attack from Israeli forces on June 8, 1967 are as follows:

    Lcdr. Phillip McCutcheon Armstrong Jr.Lt. James Cecil PierceLt. Stephen Spencer TothCT3 William Bernard AllenbaughSN Gary Ray BlanchardCT2 Allen Merle BlueQM3 Francis BrownCT2 Ronnie Jordan CampbellCT2 Jerry Leroy ConverseCT2 Robert Burton EisenbergCT2 Jerry Lee GossCT1 Curtis Alan GravesCTSN Lawrence Paul HaydenCT1 Warren Edward HerseyCT3 Alan HigginsSN Carl Lewis HoarCTS Richard Walter Keene Jr.CTSN James Lee LenauCTC Raymond Eugene LinnCT1 James Mahlon LuptonCT3 Duane Rowe MarggrafCTSN David Walter MarlboroughCT2 Anthony Peter MendleCTSN Carl Christian NyguenSgt. Jack Lewis Raper, USMCCpl. Edward Emory Kehmeyer III, USMCIFCN David SkolakCT1 John Caleb Smith Jr.CTC Melvin Douglas SmithPC2 John Clarence SpicherGMG3 Alexander Neil Thompson Jr.CT3 Thomas Ray ThorntonCT3 Philippe Charles TiedtheCT1 Frederick James Walton

    Will the truth ever come to light?

    The only thing perhaps more outrageous than the attack on the USS Liberty by Israel is our own government’s apparent compliance in the cover-up. Despite bombshell revelations by career naval officers, an Israeli pilot, and a U.S. Ambassador…Congress continues to ignore the facts of the Liberty attack as well as the pleas for an investigation.

    What is Congress afraid of?

    Could it be due to the fact that AIPAC (The American Israel Public Affairs Committee) donates very heavily to so many of our Senators and Congressmen?

    The Center for Responsive Politics reports that between the years of 1990-2004, pro-Israel groups gave $56.8 million in campaign contributions to U.S. politicians.

    As the 45th anniversary of the attack on the USS Liberty nears, please take a moment to remember those killed and injured on that day, and also, take the time to contact your Congressman and Senators to demand an official investigation into this tragedy.

    To the USS Liberty survivors and the families of those lost...You have not been forgotten.

    Read the war crimes complaint filed by the USS Liberty Veterans Association...

    Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccwatch immigration news videos

    Lesbian couple charged with faking hate crime in Colorado

  • Venus transit

    Slideshow: Across the country, many caught the rare Venus Transit.

    In case you missed it

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccget more immigration news

    Police: Family tied girl tied to tree, pelted her with eggs

  • Venus transit

    Slideshow: Across the country, many caught the rare Venus Transit.

    In case you missed it

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccparticipate in immigration news polls

    92-year-old woman killed for loose change in New Jersey

  • Venus transit

    Slideshow: Across the country, many caught the rare Venus Transit.

    In case you missed it

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccsee justice served immigration news

    Another ‘random act’ of black-on-white violence

  • Venus transit

    Slideshow: Across the country, many caught the rare Venus Transit.

    In case you missed it

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.cc immigration news - sex crimes of illegal immigrants

    George Zimmerman back in jail

    On Sunday afternoon, George Zimmerman, the man charged with the murder of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, turned himself in to authorities after his bond was revoked amid claims that he misled the court about his financial situation.

    Judge Kenneth Lester revoked Zimmerman’s bond on Friday with prosecutors alleging perjury, as Zimmerman claimed to be broke when his legal defense fund actually had raised $135,000 in donations.

    In April, the prosecution asked for $1 million in bail, but Judge Lester set bail at $150,000. As is customary, Zimmerman put up ten percent to the bail bondsman and was set free on April 20.

    That fund has now reportedly raised more than $200,000.

    However, Zimmerman’s attorney, Mark O’Mara told reporters that all of the money is in a special trust that neither he nor his client can touch right now.

    O’Mara plans to ask for a new bond hearing on Monday.

    The Miami Herald reports that Zimmerman is now confined to a 67 square foot cell in the Polk County Correctional facility, with $500 in his jail account.

    He is being kept away from the general population for his own protection.

    In April, the prosecution asked for $1 million in bail, but Judge Lester set bail at $150,000. As is customary, Zimmerman put up ten percent to the bail bondsman and was set free on April 20.Zimmerman’s trial is not expected to begin until some time next year.

    Read more about Zimmerman's case:

    New Black Panthers place bounty on Zimmerman's head

    Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccget more immigration news

    Tuesday, June 5, 2012

    The war crime you have never heard of....attack on the USS Liberty

    Next week marks the 45th anniversary of a ruthless, unprovoked and as yet, unpunished attack on an American warship in international waters which resulted in a tremendous loss of life and left more permanently injured. The attack was perpetrated by a country which our government labels a staunch ally, though the men who survived the attack know a different story.

    The attack

    On June 8, 1967, the surveillance ship USS Liberty was on duty in international waters off the Sinai Peninsula, when it was attacked by Israeli forces. Though the ship was clearly marked, Israel claimed the act of war to simply be a case of “mistaken identity.”

    Despite the loss of 34 American sailors, there has never been a meaningful investigation into the attack.

    That morning, many Liberty sailors were enjoying some down time sunbathing on deck, and had been watching as Israeli planes made over-flights of the ship. The crew counted a total of 13 such flights which were so low that they could see the faces of the Israeli pilots and even exchanged waves.

    At 2 p.m. Israeli jets began hitting the Liberty with rocket and cannon fire, the decks were then napalmed, and the ship was hit with a torpedo from an Israeli attack boat. By the time the attack had ended, the Liberty had sustained over 800 rocket and cannon strikes, 34 sailors were dead and 172 injured, even the Liberty's life boats had been shredded by Israeli machine gun fire (a war crime).

    Such a dastardly and deliberate attack would ordinarily bring down the full wrath of the U.S. military upon the perpetrators. However, not only were there no retaliatory strikes ordered but the Johnson administration would not even allow nearby U.S. Navy forces to come to Liberty's aid and put a stop to the attack.

    Once the Liberty could establish radio contact, they hailed the Sixth Fleet for assistance.

    Twice, F-4 Phantoms were launched from the USS Saratoga and the USS America and both times Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara ordered the planes to return. After the second recall, Rear Adm. William Geis personally called the Pentagon. During that phone call, President Johnson himself reportedly came on the line and ordered the planes to return.

    Years ago, USS Liberty survivor, Cdr. David Lewis stated that Adm. Geis told him in confidence that President Johnson said: “I do not care if every man drowned and the ship sank, we will not embarrass an ally.”

    The 'investigation'

    Following the attack, a U.S. Navy Board of Inquiry convened. Though the amount of evidence was immense and there were several dozen interviews to conduct, the Court of Inquiry was given only one week to complete their work. The Court was not even allowed to consider sworn declarations from more than 60 still-hospitalized Liberty sailors.

    Chief Legal Counsel to the Board of Inquiry Capt. Ward Boston and president of the Court Adm. Isaac C. Kidd felt it necessary to travel to Israel and interview those who had taken part in the attack. They were rebuffed in that effort by Adm. John S. McCain Jr., then serving as Commander-in-Chief, Naval Forces Europe.

    Adm. McCain would not allow the two any contact with the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF).In a sworn affidavit, Capt. Ward Boston (ret.) made the following statements concurring with the cover-up of the USS Liberty attack:

    “I know from personal conversations I had with Admiral Kidd that President Lyndon Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara ordered him to conclude that the attack was a case of ‘mistaken identity’ despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

    Admiral Kidd told me, after returning from Washington D.C. that he had been ordered to sit down with two civilians from either the White House or the Defense Department, and rewrite portions of the court's findings.

    Admiral Kidd also told me that he had been ordered to ‘put the lid’ on everything having to do with the attack on USS Liberty. We were never to speak of it and we were to caution everyone else involved that they could never speak of it again.

    I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of that statement as I know that the Court of Inquiry transcript that has been released to the public is not the same one that I certified and sent off to Washington.

    Finally, the testimony of Lt. Painter concerning the deliberate machine gunning of the life rafts by the Israeli torpedo boat crews, which I distinctly recall being given at the Court of Inquiry and included in the original transcript is now missing and has been excised.”

    On Jan. 8, 2004, Capt. Boston concluded: “The evidence was clear. Both Adm. Kidd and I believed with certainty that this attack...was a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew. It was our shared belief that the attack could not possibly have been an accident. I am certain that the Israeli pilots [and] their superiors were well aware that the ship was American.”

    In 2003, an independent committee comprised of retired high-ranking military officers and a former U.S. Ambassador to the Middle-East formed to examine the attack on the Liberty and the subsequent cover-up. On Oct. 22, 2003, the group came to Capitol Hill to release their findings and ask Congress for an official investigation.

    Committee member and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Thomas Moorer made the following statement: “Congress has never investigated the recall by the White House of U.S. Navy aircraft sent to rescue the Liberty while the ship was still under attack. The White House cancellation of the Navy's attempt to rescue the Liberty is the most disgraceful thing I have witnessed in my entire military career.”

    He continued: “Why would our government put Israel's interests ahead of our own? Does it continue to do so? This is an important issue that should be investigated by an independent Commission of Inquiry, the findings have grave implications for our national security and for the American people. In order to confront this problem, the American people and our elected officials will need to overcome their fear of the pro-Israel lobby in the United States.”

    In 1991, Adm. Moorer told the Washington Post: “To suggest that they [the IDF] couldn't identify the ship is...ridiculous. Anybody who could not identify the Liberty could not tell the difference between the White House and the Washington Monument.”

    Why did it happen?

    Israel claimed that they mistook the Liberty for the Egyptian horse carrier El Quseir.However, the El Quseir was only 275 feet long as compared to the 455 foot length of the Liberty.

    It was later learned that the El Quseir was actually in port in Alexandria for the duration of the Six Days War.

    The USS Liberty was well marked and flew a large American flag atop her mast. In fact, the official Navy Board of Inquiry report contains the following statement: “The Navy inquiry confirms testimony of five members of the crew that they had personally observed the [American flag] was hoisted. Hull markings were clear and freshly painted.”

    Despite the official Israeli story of mistaken identity, two Israeli pilots radioed base and clearly identified the ship as American. They were ordered to attack the ship anyway, both refused. The pair was immediately arrested upon returning to base.

    In 1982, an Israeli pilot who took part in the attack, Evan Toni, spoke extensively with Rep. Paul McCloskey (R-CA). He told McCloskey that his superiors told him to ignore the markings and U.S. flag. Toni claimed that he and another pilot radioed base and clearly identified the ship as American.

    Former U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon, Dwight Porter, confirmed the pilot's account. Porter told columnist Robert Novak that he heard the exchange as radio transmissions were being monitored from the embassy.

    There are two prevailing theories as to why Israeli forces attacked the Liberty. One is that they would sink the ship and blame it on Egypt, thus prompting the U.S. to enter the war on the side of Israel. That theory was supported by Capt. Ward Boston, who died in 2008. The other is that Israel did not want the U.S. to know about the unprovoked attacks their troops were carrying out. Shortly after the liberty was nearly destroyed, Israeli troops began attacking Syria.

    Israel's 'payment'

    In 1980, Sen. Adlai Stevenson III (D-IL) held a press conference at which time he announced his belief that the Israeli attack on the Liberty had not been a tragic accident but a deliberate act. In his last year in the U.S. Senate, Stevenson promised a formal investigation.

    Many pro-Israel groups began pouring money into the campaign of Stevenson’s opponent and he was subsequently defeated.

    However, shortly after Stevenson's announcement, the Israeli government contacted the Carter White House. They offered to settle the damage claims for a rather insulting $6 million. Though President Carter was out of town, Vice-President Walter Mondale readily accepted the deal.

    It was obvious to most that the only reason Israel agreed to pay anything was due to Sen. Stevenson’s interest in the case.

    Israel did pay the $6 million in three annual payments of $2 million. However, the payments were rather meaningless, as Congress simply increased the amount of aid given to Israel by $2 million each of those three years. The American taxpayers were actually billed for the damages inflicted upon their own sailors.

    The victims

    For his actions during the attack, USS Liberty Capt. William McGonagle was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor at a private Washington Navy Yard ceremony. However, on the very same day that Capt. McGonagle received the medal, President Johnson held a very public White House ceremony honoring other CMH awardees. McGonagle's citation does not mention that his ship came under attack from Israeli forces.

    Perhaps, more maddening than crucial facts deleted from a medal citation is that which is omitted from the tombstones of the 34 fallen USS Liberty crewmen. Their headstones simply read “Died in Eastern Mediterranean.”

    The names of the USS Liberty crewmen who were killed while under attack from Israeli forces on June 8, 1967 are as follows:

    Lcdr. Phillip McCutcheon Armstrong Jr.Lt. James Cecil PierceLt. Stephen Spencer TothCT3 William Bernard AllenbaughSN Gary Ray BlanchardCT2 Allen Merle BlueQM3 Francis BrownCT2 Ronnie Jordan CampbellCT2 Jerry Leroy ConverseCT2 Robert Burton EisenbergCT2 Jerry Lee GossCT1 Curtis Alan GravesCTSN Lawrence Paul HaydenCT1 Warren Edward HerseyCT3 Alan HigginsSN Carl Lewis HoarCTS Richard Walter Keene Jr.CTSN James Lee LenauCTC Raymond Eugene LinnCT1 James Mahlon LuptonCT3 Duane Rowe MarggrafCTSN David Walter MarlboroughCT2 Anthony Peter MendleCTSN Carl Christian NyguenSgt. Jack Lewis Raper, USMCCpl. Edward Emory Kehmeyer III, USMCIFCN David SkolakCT1 John Caleb Smith Jr.CTC Melvin Douglas SmithPC2 John Clarence SpicherGMG3 Alexander Neil Thompson Jr.CT3 Thomas Ray ThorntonCT3 Philippe Charles TiedtheCT1 Frederick James Walton

    Will the truth ever come to light?

    The only thing perhaps more outrageous than the attack on the USS Liberty by Israel is our own government’s apparent compliance in the cover-up. Despite bombshell revelations by career naval officers, an Israeli pilot, and a U.S. Ambassador…Congress continues to ignore the facts of the Liberty attack as well as the pleas for an investigation.

    What is Congress afraid of?

    Could it be due to the fact that AIPAC (The American Israel Public Affairs Committee) donates very heavily to so many of our Senators and Congressmen?

    The Center for Responsive Politics reports that between the years of 1990-2004, pro-Israel groups gave $56.8 million in campaign contributions to U.S. politicians.

    As the 45th anniversary of the attack on the USS Liberty nears, please take a moment to remember those killed and injured on that day, and also, take the time to contact your Congressman and Senators to demand an official investigation into this tragedy.

    To the USS Liberty survivors and the families of those lost...You have not been forgotten.

    Read the war crimes complaint filed by the USS Liberty Veterans Association...

    Powered By iWebRSS.co.cc immigration news - sex crimes of illegal immigrants

    Another ‘random act’ of black-on-white violence

  • Mitt Romney

    See who's ahead in the polls, and get updates on issues that matter.

    Elections news you can use

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccparticipate in immigration news polls

    Police: Family tied girl tied to tree, pelted her with eggs

  • Mitt Romney

    See who's ahead in the polls, and get updates on issues that matter.

    Elections news you can use

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccsee justice served immigration news

    George Zimmerman back in jail

    On Sunday afternoon, George Zimmerman, the man charged with the murder of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, turned himself in to authorities after his bond was revoked amid claims that he misled the court about his financial situation.

    Judge Kenneth Lester revoked Zimmerman’s bond on Friday with prosecutors alleging perjury, as Zimmerman claimed to be broke when his legal defense fund actually had raised $135,000 in donations.

    In April, the prosecution asked for $1 million in bail, but Judge Lester set bail at $150,000. As is customary, Zimmerman put up ten percent to the bail bondsman and was set free on April 20.

    That fund has now reportedly raised more than $200,000.

    However, Zimmerman’s attorney, Mark O’Mara told reporters that all of the money is in a special trust that neither he nor his client can touch right now.

    O’Mara plans to ask for a new bond hearing on Monday.

    The Miami Herald reports that Zimmerman is now confined to a 67 square foot cell in the Polk County Correctional facility, with $500 in his jail account.

    He is being kept away from the general population for his own protection.

    In April, the prosecution asked for $1 million in bail, but Judge Lester set bail at $150,000. As is customary, Zimmerman put up ten percent to the bail bondsman and was set free on April 20.Zimmerman’s trial is not expected to begin until some time next year.

    Read more about Zimmerman's case:

    New Black Panthers place bounty on Zimmerman's head

    Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccget more immigration news

    Lesbian couple charged with faking hate crime in Colorado

  • Mitt Romney

    See who's ahead in the polls, and get updates on issues that matter.

    Elections news you can use

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccwatch immigration news videos

    Monday, June 4, 2012

    Another ‘random act’ of black-on-white violence

  • Miss USA

    Slideshow: Miss RI Olivia Culpo has been crowned Miss USA.

    See photos of the beauty

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccwatch immigration news videos

    The war crime you have never heard of....attack on the USS Liberty

    Next week marks the 45th anniversary of a ruthless, unprovoked and as yet, unpunished attack on an American warship in international waters which resulted in a tremendous loss of life and left more permanently injured. The attack was perpetrated by a country which our government labels a staunch ally, though the men who survived the attack know a different story.

    The attack

    On June 8, 1967, the surveillance ship USS Liberty was on duty in international waters off the Sinai Peninsula, when it was attacked by Israeli forces. Though the ship was clearly marked, Israel claimed the act of war to simply be a case of “mistaken identity.”

    Despite the loss of 34 American sailors, there has never been a meaningful investigation into the attack.

    That morning, many Liberty sailors were enjoying some down time sunbathing on deck, and had been watching as Israeli planes made over-flights of the ship. The crew counted a total of 13 such flights which were so low that they could see the faces of the Israeli pilots and even exchanged waves.

    At 2 p.m. Israeli jets began hitting the Liberty with rocket and cannon fire, the decks were then napalmed, and the ship was hit with a torpedo from an Israeli attack boat. By the time the attack had ended, the Liberty had sustained over 800 rocket and cannon strikes, 34 sailors were dead and 172 injured, even the Liberty's life boats had been shredded by Israeli machine gun fire (a war crime).

    Such a dastardly and deliberate attack would ordinarily bring down the full wrath of the U.S. military upon the perpetrators. However, not only were there no retaliatory strikes ordered but the Johnson administration would not even allow nearby U.S. Navy forces to come to Liberty's aid and put a stop to the attack.

    Once the Liberty could establish radio contact, they hailed the Sixth Fleet for assistance.

    Twice, F-4 Phantoms were launched from the USS Saratoga and the USS America and both times Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara ordered the planes to return. After the second recall, Rear Adm. William Geis personally called the Pentagon. During that phone call, President Johnson himself reportedly came on the line and ordered the planes to return.

    Years ago, USS Liberty survivor, Cdr. David Lewis stated that Adm. Geis told him in confidence that President Johnson said: “I do not care if every man drowned and the ship sank, we will not embarrass an ally.”

    The 'investigation'

    Following the attack, a U.S. Navy Board of Inquiry convened. Though the amount of evidence was immense and there were several dozen interviews to conduct, the Court of Inquiry was given only one week to complete their work. The Court was not even allowed to consider sworn declarations from more than 60 still-hospitalized Liberty sailors.

    Chief Legal Counsel to the Board of Inquiry Capt. Ward Boston and president of the Court Adm. Isaac C. Kidd felt it necessary to travel to Israel and interview those who had taken part in the attack. They were rebuffed in that effort by Adm. John S. McCain Jr., then serving as Commander-in-Chief, Naval Forces Europe.

    Adm. McCain would not allow the two any contact with the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF).In a sworn affidavit, Capt. Ward Boston (ret.) made the following statements concurring with the cover-up of the USS Liberty attack:

    “I know from personal conversations I had with Admiral Kidd that President Lyndon Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara ordered him to conclude that the attack was a case of ‘mistaken identity’ despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

    Admiral Kidd told me, after returning from Washington D.C. that he had been ordered to sit down with two civilians from either the White House or the Defense Department, and rewrite portions of the court's findings.

    Admiral Kidd also told me that he had been ordered to ‘put the lid’ on everything having to do with the attack on USS Liberty. We were never to speak of it and we were to caution everyone else involved that they could never speak of it again.

    I have no reason to doubt the accuracy of that statement as I know that the Court of Inquiry transcript that has been released to the public is not the same one that I certified and sent off to Washington.

    Finally, the testimony of Lt. Painter concerning the deliberate machine gunning of the life rafts by the Israeli torpedo boat crews, which I distinctly recall being given at the Court of Inquiry and included in the original transcript is now missing and has been excised.”

    On Jan. 8, 2004, Capt. Boston concluded: “The evidence was clear. Both Adm. Kidd and I believed with certainty that this attack...was a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew. It was our shared belief that the attack could not possibly have been an accident. I am certain that the Israeli pilots [and] their superiors were well aware that the ship was American.”

    In 2003, an independent committee comprised of retired high-ranking military officers and a former U.S. Ambassador to the Middle-East formed to examine the attack on the Liberty and the subsequent cover-up. On Oct. 22, 2003, the group came to Capitol Hill to release their findings and ask Congress for an official investigation.

    Committee member and former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Thomas Moorer made the following statement: “Congress has never investigated the recall by the White House of U.S. Navy aircraft sent to rescue the Liberty while the ship was still under attack. The White House cancellation of the Navy's attempt to rescue the Liberty is the most disgraceful thing I have witnessed in my entire military career.”

    He continued: “Why would our government put Israel's interests ahead of our own? Does it continue to do so? This is an important issue that should be investigated by an independent Commission of Inquiry, the findings have grave implications for our national security and for the American people. In order to confront this problem, the American people and our elected officials will need to overcome their fear of the pro-Israel lobby in the United States.”

    In 1991, Adm. Moorer told the Washington Post: “To suggest that they [the IDF] couldn't identify the ship is...ridiculous. Anybody who could not identify the Liberty could not tell the difference between the White House and the Washington Monument.”

    Why did it happen?

    Israel claimed that they mistook the Liberty for the Egyptian horse carrier El Quseir.However, the El Quseir was only 275 feet long as compared to the 455 foot length of the Liberty.

    It was later learned that the El Quseir was actually in port in Alexandria for the duration of the Six Days War.

    The USS Liberty was well marked and flew a large American flag atop her mast. In fact, the official Navy Board of Inquiry report contains the following statement: “The Navy inquiry confirms testimony of five members of the crew that they had personally observed the [American flag] was hoisted. Hull markings were clear and freshly painted.”

    Despite the official Israeli story of mistaken identity, two Israeli pilots radioed base and clearly identified the ship as American. They were ordered to attack the ship anyway, both refused. The pair was immediately arrested upon returning to base.

    In 1982, an Israeli pilot who took part in the attack, Evan Toni, spoke extensively with Rep. Paul McCloskey (R-CA). He told McCloskey that his superiors told him to ignore the markings and U.S. flag. Toni claimed that he and another pilot radioed base and clearly identified the ship as American.

    Former U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon, Dwight Porter, confirmed the pilot's account. Porter told columnist Robert Novak that he heard the exchange as radio transmissions were being monitored from the embassy.

    There are two prevailing theories as to why Israeli forces attacked the Liberty. One is that they would sink the ship and blame it on Egypt, thus prompting the U.S. to enter the war on the side of Israel. That theory was supported by Capt. Ward Boston, who died in 2008. The other is that Israel did not want the U.S. to know about the unprovoked attacks their troops were carrying out. Shortly after the liberty was nearly destroyed, Israeli troops began attacking Syria.

    Israel's 'payment'

    In 1980, Sen. Adlai Stevenson III (D-IL) held a press conference at which time he announced his belief that the Israeli attack on the Liberty had not been a tragic accident but a deliberate act. In his last year in the U.S. Senate, Stevenson promised a formal investigation.

    Many pro-Israel groups began pouring money into the campaign of Stevenson’s opponent and he was subsequently defeated.

    However, shortly after Stevenson's announcement, the Israeli government contacted the Carter White House. They offered to settle the damage claims for a rather insulting $6 million. Though President Carter was out of town, Vice-President Walter Mondale readily accepted the deal.

    It was obvious to most that the only reason Israel agreed to pay anything was due to Sen. Stevenson’s interest in the case.

    Israel did pay the $6 million in three annual payments of $2 million. However, the payments were rather meaningless, as Congress simply increased the amount of aid given to Israel by $2 million each of those three years. The American taxpayers were actually billed for the damages inflicted upon their own sailors.

    The victims

    For his actions during the attack, USS Liberty Capt. William McGonagle was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor at a private Washington Navy Yard ceremony. However, on the very same day that Capt. McGonagle received the medal, President Johnson held a very public White House ceremony honoring other CMH awardees. McGonagle's citation does not mention that his ship came under attack from Israeli forces.

    Perhaps, more maddening than crucial facts deleted from a medal citation is that which is omitted from the tombstones of the 34 fallen USS Liberty crewmen. Their headstones simply read “Died in Eastern Mediterranean.”

    The names of the USS Liberty crewmen who were killed while under attack from Israeli forces on June 8, 1967 are as follows:

    Lcdr. Phillip McCutcheon Armstrong Jr.Lt. James Cecil PierceLt. Stephen Spencer TothCT3 William Bernard AllenbaughSN Gary Ray BlanchardCT2 Allen Merle BlueQM3 Francis BrownCT2 Ronnie Jordan CampbellCT2 Jerry Leroy ConverseCT2 Robert Burton EisenbergCT2 Jerry Lee GossCT1 Curtis Alan GravesCTSN Lawrence Paul HaydenCT1 Warren Edward HerseyCT3 Alan HigginsSN Carl Lewis HoarCTS Richard Walter Keene Jr.CTSN James Lee LenauCTC Raymond Eugene LinnCT1 James Mahlon LuptonCT3 Duane Rowe MarggrafCTSN David Walter MarlboroughCT2 Anthony Peter MendleCTSN Carl Christian NyguenSgt. Jack Lewis Raper, USMCCpl. Edward Emory Kehmeyer III, USMCIFCN David SkolakCT1 John Caleb Smith Jr.CTC Melvin Douglas SmithPC2 John Clarence SpicherGMG3 Alexander Neil Thompson Jr.CT3 Thomas Ray ThorntonCT3 Philippe Charles TiedtheCT1 Frederick James Walton

    Will the truth ever come to light?

    The only thing perhaps more outrageous than the attack on the USS Liberty by Israel is our own government’s apparent compliance in the cover-up. Despite bombshell revelations by career naval officers, an Israeli pilot, and a U.S. Ambassador…Congress continues to ignore the facts of the Liberty attack as well as the pleas for an investigation.

    What is Congress afraid of?

    Could it be due to the fact that AIPAC (The American Israel Public Affairs Committee) donates very heavily to so many of our Senators and Congressmen?

    The Center for Responsive Politics reports that between the years of 1990-2004, pro-Israel groups gave $56.8 million in campaign contributions to U.S. politicians.

    As the 45th anniversary of the attack on the USS Liberty nears, please take a moment to remember those killed and injured on that day, and also, take the time to contact your Congressman and Senators to demand an official investigation into this tragedy.

    To the USS Liberty survivors and the families of those lost...You have not been forgotten.

    Read the war crimes complaint filed by the USS Liberty Veterans Association...

    Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccparticipate in immigration news polls

    Police: Family tied girl tied to tree, pelted her with eggs

  • Miss USA

    Slideshow: Miss RI Olivia Culpo has been crowned Miss USA.

    See photos of the beauty

  • Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccread interesting immigration news opinions

    George Zimmerman back in jail

    On Sunday afternoon, George Zimmerman, the man charged with the murder of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, turned himself in to authorities after his bond was revoked amid claims that he misled the court about his financial situation.

    Judge Kenneth Lester revoked Zimmerman’s bond on Friday with prosecutors alleging perjury, as Zimmerman claimed to be broke when his legal defense fund actually had raised $135,000 in donations.

    In April, the prosecution asked for $1 million in bail, but Judge Lester set bail at $150,000. As is customary, Zimmerman put up ten percent to the bail bondsman and was set free on April 20.

    That fund has now reportedly raised more than $200,000.

    However, Zimmerman’s attorney, Mark O’Mara told reporters that all of the money is in a special trust that neither he nor his client can touch right now.

    O’Mara plans to ask for a new bond hearing on Monday.

    The Miami Herald reports that Zimmerman is now confined to a 67 square foot cell in the Polk County Correctional facility, with $500 in his jail account.

    He is being kept away from the general population for his own protection.

    In April, the prosecution asked for $1 million in bail, but Judge Lester set bail at $150,000. As is customary, Zimmerman put up ten percent to the bail bondsman and was set free on April 20.Zimmerman’s trial is not expected to begin until some time next year.

    Read more about Zimmerman's case:

    New Black Panthers place bounty on Zimmerman's head

    Powered By iWebRSS.co.ccget more immigration news

    Illegal Alien News CNN

    Immigration News Daily

    Blog Archive